Our friend Albert came over for dinner last night and we had a good visit. Albert is a residential real estate appraiser, so he and Walter always have a lot to talk about. One of the subjects last night was a recent decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in a case called FNC. I won't go into all of the extremely interesting details, but suffice it to say that this is a big case.
But that's not the reason for this post. I know that everyone makes fun of lawyers and, believe me, I've read some really horrible writing in decisions over the years. This decision, however, was a delight to read. It was almost poetic in places. My favorite:
While a multifactor test such as this one enevitably entails some measure of internal redundancy, it is nonetheless a valuable heuristic. These factors do not pose five wholly distinct inquiries. Instead, each turn of the prism illuminates a slightly different facet of a single underlying question.
Is that great stuff, or what? Makes you want to rush out and read the entire decision, doesn't it? Do you know what "heuristic" means?
Heuristic (adj) - enabling a person to discover or learn something for themselves: a "hands-on" or interactive heuristic approach to learning.
And no, I'm not bothered by the way the judge used the adjective as a noun. Just this week we're reading about "sheening" a situation (use your imagination!) So don't be surprised if I toss this word out in casual conversation...
No comments:
Post a Comment